The meeting does not open with your name
It opens with a number.
The pool is sized before a single person is discussed. Somebody says how
many promotions there are this cycle, and only then does anyone start talking about who.
By the time your name comes up, the shape of the answer already exists.
The second thing nobody tells you is what you are being compared
against. Not the criteria. The criteria are the language the conversation is conducted
in. You are being ranked against the other people in the set, and the set was drawn up
by somebody else.
Which makes your delivery the entry ticket. It gets you into
the comparison and no further.
That is the part that catches senior people out, and it catches the
strongest performers hardest. They have spent three years being told their delivery is
excellent, and it is, and it is also the thing everybody else in the pool has. Being
undeniable on the axis where everyone is undeniable does not move you.
I was Head of Technology HR at Credit Suisse. Then technology reward at
UBS, during the integration, running the full technology reward cycle across a function
of 24,000 people. I sat in the calibration meetings where these sets were drawn and these
rankings argued. I did not own those decisions and I did not decide who went up. I
advised, and I watched how it was really settled, which is a different and more useful
thing to know.