What actually happens in the room
A year of somebody's work gets settled in about ninety seconds. Not because
anybody is careless. Because by the time the discussion reaches the room, the case has already
been made or it has not, and what is being argued is a view, not a number.
That is the part almost nobody outside those rooms believes. Reward and
promotion are not decided on output. They are decided on performance, which is a subjective
view formed by a line manager and then defended in front of peers. Judgement gets weighed.
The consequences of your decisions get weighed. Neither is scored.
Which means the person who can describe their own value in the
language the room uses has an advantage that has nothing to do with working harder. And most
senior people have never had to build that description, because the organisation was doing it
for them.
Head of Technology HR at Credit Suisse, working to a Chief Technology Officer
who sat on the Executive Board. Then technology reward at UBS, during the integration. Sixteen
years in banking, across a technology population of more than 24,000, and a great deal of it
spent in rooms where senior people were being discussed while they sat somewhere else,
waiting.
I did not decide who went where. I watched it get decided, which is a narrower
thing and a more useful one, because it is where you learn what the description actually has to
do.